Skip to main content
A Singapore Government Agency Website How to identify
Official website links end with .gov.sg
Secure websites use HTTPS
Look for a lock () or https:// as an added precaution. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Government officials will never ask you to transfer money or disclose bank log-in details over a phone call.

Call the 24/7 ScamShield Helpline at 1799 if you are unsure if something is a scam.

Competition and Consumer Commission of Singapore
Investigation | Closed - Infringement Decision Issued

Price fixing of coach bus services for travelling between Singapore and destinations in Malaysia from 2006 to 2008

3 November 2009

This article has been migrated from an earlier version of the site and may display formatting inconsistencies.


Reference:

CCS 500/003/08

Case Title

Price fixing of coach bus services for travelling between Singapore and destinations in Malaysia from 2006 to 2008

Decision Date

03 Nov 2009

Case Summary

The Competition Commission of Singapore (CCS) decided that 16 coach operators and their trade association, the Express Bus Agencies Association (EBAA), had engaged in price-fixing of coach tickets.

CCS’ investigations revealed that the coach operators, together with the EBAA, had agreed to fix the prices of coach tickets for travelling between Singapore and destinations in Malaysia from 2006 to 2008. Through meetings arranged regularly under the auspices of EBAA, the coach operators agreed to fix the coach prices in two ways:

  • Minimum Selling Prices (MSP) of the coach tickets sold.  As a result, these coach operators adjusted ticket prices to either at or above the MSP, resulting in higher ticket prices.

  • Fuel & Insurance Charges (FIC) imposed across the board to mark up ticket prices. The FIC was revised upwards on various occasions after it was implemented.

The financial penalties levied on the 17 infringing parties totalled $1.69 million (see Annex A for the breakdown of penalties for each party). In fixing the appropriate amount of financial penalty, CCS took into account a number of factors, including the nature and structure of the market, market shares of the parties involved in the infringement and the impact and effect of the infringement.

Further information on CCS’ investigation, analysis of the case and the basis for the calculation of the financial penalty imposed on the infringing parties are set out in the Infringement Decision (ID) and the document is available here (opens in new tab).

Useful links:

Infringement Decision (opens in new tab), Media Release  and Competition Appeal Board's Decision (opens in new tab)